英语翻译Some authors attribute community benefits to a presumed

英语翻译
Some authors attribute community benefits to a presumed tendency of sustainable agriculture to bring about a more communally minded style of farming through its
very philosophy.According to Lasley et al.(1993) and Kirschenmann (1992),this philosophy advocates not only working in concert with nature,but also cooperating
with one’s neighbors and fostering a communal spirit.Such claims suggest that because sustainable farmers must understand the relationships between their crops
and the surrounding environment,they are also more predisposed to view themselves as embedded in local community relations that are essential to their well-being.
Flora (1990) likewise argues that sustainable agriculture,with its food quality concerns,is inherently more consumer-oriented and more closely tied to local markets.Sustainable farmers,therefore,may be intrinsically more disposed towards civic participation and working together to achieve regional self-sufficiency.
Civic participation,in turn,can benefit the farmers themselves by helping them to build social capital.According to Putnam (1995) and Coleman (1990),social
capital is the set of resources inherent in interpersonal relationships and social organization that can be used to enhance cooperation for mutual benefit.These resources include not only family and community relationships,but also norms of reciprocity and relations of authority and trust.Social capital can facilitate effective resource mobilization and community-based problem solving (Flora,1995).Sustainable farmers in particular need to facilitate such processes to develop alternative information services and knowledge networks as well as alternative
input sources and stable markets for their products.
Social capital that extends into the wider,non-farming community can also help rural communities and farmers.A consuming public that understands how a healthy food
system works and that sees the links between its own health and the health of farm communities is more likely to support policies beneficial to agriculture.Sustainable farmers especially need the support of educated consumers in order to survive within the dominant economic and policy framework that often still favors more industrial scale and conventional modes of production (Dahlberg,1993).Consumers can develop an understanding of agriculture through appropriate education and by engaging with farmers in direct marketing mechanisms such as subscription farming,farmers markets,and farm-to-school programs.An already abundant literature on local food systems details the numerous economic and social benefits accruing to both farmers and consumers when they are re-connected in direct marketing schemes (see Lyson et al.,1995; Feenstra,1997).

有些作者假设属性社会效益一个持续农业的发展趋势,通过农业把思想更communally风格.
非常哲学.根据Lasley孙俐.(1993)和Kirschenmann(1992),这一理念倡导不仅工作应会同天性,还合作与你的邻居和培养一个公共的精神这样的声明显示,因为可持续农民之间的关系必须理解农作物和周围环境,他们也更倾向于认为自己是嵌在地方社区的关系,必要自己的康复.
弗洛拉(1990)同样认为,可持续农业,以其食品质量问题,是固有地更多的顾客的关系更紧密,当地市场可持续的农民,因此,可能是本质上处理对公民参与,共同实现区域自负.
市民参与,进而可以造福农民自己,帮助他们建立社会资本根据普特南(1995)以及科尔曼(1990年),社会的发展
资本是固有的一组资源良好的人际关系和社会团体,可以用来加强互利合作.这些资源包括不但家人和社区关系,而且互惠互利关系的规范的权威和信任.能促进社会资本资源有效动员和社区解决问题(弗洛拉,1995).可持续的农民在特别的需要来促进等过程中发展接续信息服务和知识网络的选择输入源和稳定的市场产品.
社会资本广阔,剖析城市延伸到社区也能帮助农村社区,农民一种消费的公众承诺理解一个健康的食物系统的工作和之间的联系看到自己的健康和农民们的健康社区更容易扶持政策有利于农业.特别需要支持可持续农民受过高等教育的消费者在为了生存的主导经济和政策框架,通常还支持更多的生产规模,传统的生产方式和(Dahlberg,1993).消费者可以更深入地理解农业通过适当的教育和——农民有直接营销机制如订阅农业、农民市场,farm-to-school程序.一个已经丰富的文献在细节本地食物系统的众多的经济效益和社会效益于农民和消费者都re-connected时直接营销方案(见Lyson苏达权等,2000;Feenstra,1997).