英语翻译麻烦大虾们不要用软件翻译器,Introduction In 1959,Calvin Mooers,one of

英语翻译
麻烦大虾们不要用软件翻译器,
Introduction
In 1959,Calvin Mooers,one of the pioneers of Information Retrieval,set forth what he called a "contradictory principle" of the fledgling science,and attached his own name to it:
Mooers’ Law:An information retrieval system will tend not to be used whenever it is more painful and troublesome for a customer to have information than for him not to have it.(1959b,p.1)
Since that time,his law has been widely referenced,especially in recent years as Information Retrieval has become more central to our society and our individual lives; a by-no-means exhaustive survey of the World Wide Web and the literature of various disciplines (Business,Education,Computer Science,and Library Science) reveals several dozen citations from the last decade alone.An interesting thing has happened to Mooers’ Law,however,along the way to acceptance:the law that is becoming widely held as true by information professionals is not the same one that Mr.Mooers proposed.
The difference between the actual law and its mutation centers specifically upon a misinterpretation of the word "have",a misinterpretation which perhaps results primarily from reading the law excerpted from the original article in which it appeared,and applying it to a concern that is distinctly separate from the one Mr.Mooers was attempting to address.What follows,then,is an effort to compare and contrast what are really two very different Mooers’ Laws,which for the purposes of this discussion will be categorized as "In" and "Out of" context.

介绍
1959年,卡尔文穆尔斯,对信息检索的先驱之一,提出了他所谓的“矛盾的原则,羽翼未丰的科学”,并附加自己的名字给它：
穆尔斯定律：信息检索系统往往不被使用时它更痛苦和麻烦的客户有比他不要把它的信息.（1959b,第1页）
从那时起,他的律师已被广泛引用,特别是近年来,随着信息检索已成为更为重要的社会和我们个人的生活;一按不意味着彻底调查万维网和各类学科文献（商业,教育,计算机科学,
与图书馆学）揭示从过去十年仅几十引用.一个有趣的事情发生了穆尔斯'法,但是,沿着验收方式：法律,正在成为真正的广泛的信息专业人员举办是不一样的一穆尔斯先生提出的.
在特别谈到了这个词的误解差异的实际法律及其突变中心“有”,一个误解,或许结果主要来自阅读从原来的文章,其中出现,并应用到一个关切问题,是明显的法律摘录从一个单独的穆尔斯先生试图解决的问题.接下来,那么,
是为了比较和对比什么是两个非常不同的穆尔斯'的法律,它为这次讨论会的目的是“在”与“走出”方面分类.
可能不是很对!